[Treatment of actinic keratoses in older adults]. / Therapie aktinischer Keratosen beim älteren Menschen.

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are common precancerous skin lesions that primarily affect older adults due to cumulative sun exposure. Given the increased vulnerability of older adults to developing AKs, appropriate therapeutic strategies are crucial to prevent their progression to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. This comprehensive review aims to explore the various treatment modalities available for AKs in the elderly population, focusing on their efficacy, safety, and suitability for this specific age group. The article discusses topical treatments, cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, chemical peels, and surgical interventions, providing a detailed analysis of their mechanisms of action, benefits, limitations, and considerations in geriatric patients. Furthermore, the importance of individualized treatment plans, considering factors such as comorbidities, medication interactions, and patient preferences, are highlighted.

Pretreatment with ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser improves treatment efficacy in a synergistic PDT protocol for actinic keratoses on the head.

BACKGROUND: A recently proposed synergistic photodynamic therapy protocol (s-PDT) combining advantages of both conventional- and daylight-PDT proved to be an effective and almost painless treatment for patients with actinic keratoses (AKs). This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an additional ablative fractional CO2-laser (AFXL) pretreatment. METHODS: 28 patients with AKs on the head received s-PDT using 5-aminolevulinic acid. AFXL pretreatment was conducted using the following parameters: pulse energy 8 mJ, spot density 50 spots/cm2, power 30 W, beam size 4-18 mm. Outcome was assessed by AK area and severity index (AKASI) and lesion count (LC) before and 3 months after treatment. Safety was monitored by blood pressure and pulse measurements. Intensity of pain was determined by use of a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Most patients (96.4 %) showed a significant AKASI reduction (P < 0.0001) 3 months after PDT (median AKASI 1.6 [0-2.4]) compared to baseline (5.3 [4-7.75]). Median reduction rate was 75.5 % (61.3 %-100 %). Eleven patients (39.3 %) achieved AKASI 100, three (10.7 %) AKASI 75 and ten (35.7 %) AKASI 50. Blood pressure and pulse did not change significantly throughout treatment. Median VAS for pain during irradiation was 0 (0-0), 0 (0-2) and 0 (0-2) at the beginning, in the meantime and at the end, respectively. Compared to data without AFXL pretreatment, this study showed significantly higher AKASI and LC reduction rates (75.5 % vs. 63.7 % [P = 0.023] and 91.3 % vs. 80.4 % [P = 0.043]). CONCLUSIONS: S-PDT with AFXL pretreatment represents a safe and almost painless treatment for patients with AKs on the head and improves treatment efficacy.

A glycopyrronium bromide 1% cream for topical treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: efficacy and safety results from a phase IIIa randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective topical treatment options for patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAHH) are limited. A phase I trial showed promising results regarding the efficacy and safety of a topical cream containing glycopyrronium bromide (GPB). OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a 4-week topical treatment of GPB 1% cream in patients with PAHH vs. placebo. METHODS: In total, 171 patients (84 receiving placebo; 87 receiving GPB 1%) with PAHH were included in the 4-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIa part of the pivotal study. Sweat production was measured by gravimetry. Patients rated the impact of disease with the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) and Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index (HidroQoL© ). RESULTS: Absolute change in sweat production from baseline to day 29 in logarithmic values was significantly larger in the GPB 1% group compared with the placebo group (P = 0·004). The improvement in HidroQoL exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of 4. The proportion of responders was twofold higher for sweat reduction (-197·08 mg GPB 1% vs. -83·49 mg placebo), HDSS (23% GPB 1% vs. 12% placebo) and HidroQoL (60% GPB 1% vs. 26% placebo). Treatment was safe: most treatment-emergent adverse effects were mild or moderate, and transient. Local tolerability was very good, with 9% of patients having only mild or moderate application-site reactions. The most reported adverse drug reaction was dry mouth (16%), an expected anticholinergic effect of the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: GPB 1% cream may provide an effective new treatment option exhibiting a good safety profile for patients with PAHH. The long-term open-label part (phase IIIb) is ongoing.

[Photodynamic therapy-trends and new developments]. / Photodynamische Therapie ­ Trends und neue Entwicklungen.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a licensed and established procedure for the treatment of actinic keratosis, basal cell carcinoma, and Bowen's disease, but there are several new and clinically relevant developments and trends. These concern on the one hand the main components of PDT, which are the photosensitizer and the light source. Furthermore, modifications and therapy combinations have been developed that lead to an improved therapeutic efficacy. An important aspect of field-directed PDT is also skin cancer prevention. Finally, PDT has been used successfully for nonlicensed indications including inflammatory diseases and skin rejuvenation. This article focuses on these new developments and on recent guideline recommendations.

[Actinic keratosis]. / Aktinische Keratosen.

Actinic keratoses (AK) are common precancerous cutaneous lesions in fair-skinned individuals as a result of cumulative exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Due to their high prevalence, AK account for a large disease burden, in particular in older persons. As AK may potentially progress into invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, guidelines recommend early and consequent treatment. Numerous lesion- and field-directed interventions with different efficacy and safety profiles are currently licensed in Germany. The appropriate intervention should be chosen together with the patient based on his or her motivation and expectations towards the treatment.

The conventional protocol vs. a protocol including illumination with a fabric-based biophotonic device (the Phosistos protocol) in photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) using methyl aminolaevulinate is a noninvasive treatment option suitable to treat clinical and subclinical actinic keratosis (AK) over a large area (field cancerization). The most widely used, conventional protocol in Europe includes illumination with a red-light lamp. This illumination commonly causes pain, and patients often cannot complete the treatment. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this paper are twofold. The first aim is to introduce a novel protocol, the Phosistos protocol (P-PDT), which includes illumination with a fabric-based biophotonic device. The second and major aim is to assess the noninferiority, in terms of efficacy for PDT of AK, of P-PDT compared with the conventional protocol (C-PDT). METHODS: A randomized, controlled, multicentre, intraindividual clinical study was conducted. Forty-six patients with grade I-II AK of the forehead and scalp were treated with P-PDT on one area (280 AK lesions) and with C-PDT on the contralateral area (280 AK lesions). The primary end point was the lesion complete response (CR) rate at 3 months, with an absolute noninferiority margin of -10%. Secondary end points included pain scores, incidence of adverse effects and cosmetic outcome. RESULTS: Three months following treatment, the lesion CR rate of P-PDT was noninferior to that of C-PDT (79·3% vs. 80·7%, respectively; absolute difference -1·6%; one-sided 95% confidence interval -4·5% to infinity). The noninferiority of P-PDT to C-PDT in terms of the lesion CR rate remained at the 6-month follow-up (94·2% vs. 94·9%, respectively; absolute difference -0·6%; one-sided 95% confidence interval -2·7% to infinity). Moreover, the pain score at the end of illumination was significantly lower for P-PDT than for C-PDT (mean ± SD 0·3 ± 0·6 vs. 7·4 ± 2·3; P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: P-PDT is noninferior to C-PDT in terms of efficacy for treating AK of the forehead and scalp and resulted in much lower pain scores and fewer adverse effects. What's already known about this topic? Topical photodynamic therapy using methyl aminolaevulinate is effective for treating actinic keratosis. In Europe, the conventional protocol involves illumination with a red-light lamp. Unfortunately, pain is often experienced by patients undergoing this protocol. An alternative protocol that uses daylight illumination has recently been shown to be as effective as the conventional protocol while being nearly painless. However, this alternative protocol can be conducted only in suitable weather conditions. What does this study add? The Phosistos protocol is demonstrated to be as effective as the conventional protocol, nearly as painless as the daylight protocols and suitable year round for treatment of actinic keratosis.

European Dermatology Forum guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy 2019 Part 2: emerging indications - field cancerization, photorejuvenation and inflammatory/infective dermatoses.

In addition to approved indications in non-melanoma skin cancer in immunocompetent patients, topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) has also been studied for its place in the treatment of, as well as its potential to prevent, superficial skin cancers in immune-suppressed patients, although sustained clearance rates are lower than for immune-competent individuals. PDT using a nanoemulsion of ALA in a daylight or conventional PDT protocol has been approved for use in field cancerization, although evidence of the potential of the treatment to prevent new SCC remained limited. High-quality evidence supports a strong recommendation for the use of topical PDT in photorejuvenation as well as for acne, refractory warts, cutaneous leishmaniasis and in onychomycosis, although these indications currently lack approvals for use and protocols remain to be optimized, with more comparative evidence with established therapies required to establish its place in practice. Adverse events across all indications for PDT can be minimized through the use of modified and low-irradiance regimens, with a low risk of contact allergy to photosensitizer prodrugs, and no other significant documented longer-term risks with no current evidence of cumulative toxicity or photocarcinogenic risk. The literature on the pharmacoeconomics for using PDT is also reviewed, although accurate comparisons are difficult to establish in different healthcare settings, comparing hospital/office-based therapies of PDT and surgery with topical ointments, requiring inclusion of number of visits, real-world efficacy as well as considering the value to be placed on cosmetic outcome and patient preference. This guideline, published over two parts, considers all current approved and emerging indications for the use of topical photodynamic therapy in Dermatology prepared by the PDT subgroup of the European Dermatology Forum guidelines committee. It presents consensual expert recommendations reflecting current published evidence.

European Dermatology Forum guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy 2019 Part 1: treatment delivery and established indications - actinic keratoses, Bowen's disease and basal cell carcinomas.

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a widely approved therapy for actinic keratoses, Bowen's disease (squamous cell carcinoma in situ), superficial and certain thin basal cell carcinomas. Recurrence rates when standard treatment protocols are used are typically equivalent to existing therapies, although inferior to surgery for nodular basal cell carcinoma. PDT can be used both as lesional and field therapies and has the potential to delay/reduce the development of new lesions. A protocol using daylight to treat actinic keratoses is widely practised, with conventional PDT using a red light after typically a 3-h period of occlusion employed for other superficial skin cancer indications as well as for actinic keratoses when daylight therapy is not feasible. PDT is a well-tolerated therapy although discomfort associated with conventional protocol may require pain-reduction measures. PDT using daylight is associated with no or minimal pain and preferred by patient. There is an emerging literature on enhancing conventional PDT protocols or combined PDT with another treatment to increase response rates. This guideline, published over two parts, considers all current approved and emerging indications for the use of topical PDT in dermatology, prepared by the PDT subgroup of the European Dermatology Forum guidelines committee. It presents consensual expert recommendations reflecting current published evidence.

PDT with PPIX absorption peaks adjusted wavelengths: Safety and efficacy of a new irradiation procedure for actinic keratoses on the head.

BACKGROUND: Daylight photodynamic therapy (dl-PDT) is an effective and almost painless treatment for patients with actinic keratoses (AKs) but carries important limitations due to seasonal conditions. PDT with Protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) peaks adjusted wavelengths might overcome these shortcomings. The aim of this study was to determine safety and efficacy of ALA-PDT with a new irradiation procedure. METHODS: Patients with AKs on the head received ALA-PDT with a new irradiation device. Emitted wavelengths are adjusted to PPIX absorption peaks (457 nm, 523 nm, 593 nm, 631 nm; 20.000 lx). PDT protocol was adapted for both 1 h of incubation and irradiation time. Outcome was assessed by AK area and severity index (AKASI) and lesion count (LC) prior to and 3 months after treatment. Safety was monitored by blood pressure and pulse measurements throughout treatment. Pain was determined by use of a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Overall, 39 patients were included and showed a significant AKASI reduction (P < 0.0001) 3 months after PDT (mean AKASI of 2 ±â€¯1.6) compared to baseline (5.2 ±â€¯1.9). Mean reduction rate was 63.7% ±24.2%, accordingly. Eight patients (20.5%) achieved AKASI 100, eleven (28.2%) AKASI 75 and thirty (76.9%) AKASI 50, respectively. There were no significant changes in blood pressure and pulse throughout treatment. Median VAS for pain during irradiation was 0 (0-1), 1 (0-1) and 0 (0-1) at the beginning, in the meantime and at the end, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ALA-PDT with a new irradiation procedure is a safe, effective and almost painless treatment option for patients with AKs on the head.

Somatic mutations in kinetochore gene KNSTRN are associated with basal proliferating actinic keratoses and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Mutations in kinetochore gene KNSTRN accelerate the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and may correlate with different histological classifications of actinic keratosis (AKs). OBJECTIVE: To determine KNSTRN gene mutation frequency in healthy skin (HS), actinically damaged skin (ADS), in AKs with different histomorphological gradings and invasive SCCs. METHODS: All samples were histologically evaluated. AK lesions were additionally classified according to their upwards (AK I-III) and downwards (PRO I-III) directed growth pattern. Mutation analyses of all samples were performed using the Sanger method. RESULTS: With one exception, all detected mutations in KNSTRN gene showed an alanine-to-glutamate substitution at codon 40 (p.Ala40Glu). p.Ala40Glu mutation was found in 6.9% (2/29) of HS, in 16.1% (5/31) of ADS, in 18.3% (20/109) of AKs and in 30.0% (9/30) of invasive SCCs. Further stratification of AKs using the common AK classification of Röwert-Huber revealed the p.Ala40Glu mutation in 14.7% (5/43), 13.3% (4/30) and 24.4% (11/45) (AK I, II and III). In contrast, the new PRO classification showed a distribution of 3.6% (1/28) in PRO I, 21.7% (13/60) in PRO II and 28.6% (6/21) in PRO III. Mutation frequency in HS showed significant differences compared to AKs classified as PRO III and invasive SCCs (P < 0.05). In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences between HS and AKs when classified according to Röwert-Huber. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent somatic mutation p.Ala40Glu in KNSTRN gene is associated with basal proliferating AKs in accordance with invasive SCCs. This supports the impact of basal proliferative pattern in terms of progression.

Evaluation of two histological classifications for actinic keratoses - PRO classification scored highest inter-rater reliability.

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) can histologically be classified by the extent of atypical keratinocytes throughout the epidermis or their pattern of basal proliferation. Currently, no data on the inter-rater reliability of both scores is available. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the two classification schemes; histological grade (AK I-III) and basal proliferation (PRO I-III). METHODS: Histological images of 54 AKs were classified by 21 independent dermatopathologists with regard to basal proliferation (PRO I-III), histological grade (AK I-III) and assumed risk of progression into invasive carcinoma. RESULTS: Overall, of the 54 AKs 16.7% (9/54) were classified as AK I, 66.7% (36/54) as AK II, and 16.7% (9/54) as AK III. With regards to basal growth pattern, 25.9% (14/54) were classified as PRO I, 42.6% (23/54) as PRO II, and 31.5% (17/54) as PRO III. We observed a highly significant inter-rater reliability for PRO-grading (P < 0.001) which was higher than for AK-grading (Kendall's W coefficient: AK = 0.488 vs. PRO = 0.793). We found substantial agreement for assumed progression risk for AKs with worsening basal proliferation (k = 0.759) compared to moderate agreement (k = 0.563) for different AK-gradings. CONCLUSIONS: Histological classification of basal growth pattern (PRO) showed higher inter-rater reliability compared to the established classification of atypical keratinocytes throughout epidermal layers. Moreover, experienced dermatopathologists considered basal proliferation to be more important in terms of progression risk than upwards directed growth patterns. It should be considered to classify AKs according to their basal proliferation pattern (PRO I-III).

Methyl aminolevulinate daylight photodynamic therapy applied at home for non-hyperkeratotic actinic keratosis of the face or scalp: an open, interventional study conducted in Germany.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of methyl aminolevulinate daylight photodynamic therapy (MAL DL-PDT) for actinic keratosis (AK) treatment has previously been demonstrated in several studies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes, effectiveness and tolerability of patient self-applied MAL DL-PDT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An open study was conducted in Germany in patients with thin or non-hyperkeratotic and non-pigmented AK. At baseline, the investigator delimited the target anatomical area and skin preparation was discretionary. On day 1, the patient performed MAL DL-PDT at home, in accordance with instructions (after applying sunscreen and skin preparation by abrasive pad). Patient questionnaires were completed on day 1 and 3 months post-treatment. Effectiveness was assessed by investigator at 3 months. Pain and adverse events (AE) were recorded. RESULTS: Patients (n = 50) were mostly elderly (mean age: 73.4 years) men (86%). After treatment on day 1, 94% of patients were overall satisfied or very satisfied with the treatment and 98% found the instructions convenient. At 3 months, most patients were satisfied or very satisfied with treatment effectiveness (88%) and aspect of their skin (80%). At 3 months, 62% of overall lesions were completely clear. The main related AEs were mild and expected (erythema, procedural pain and skin burning sensation). CONCLUSIONS: Patient self-application of MAL DL-PDT resulted in high levels of patient satisfaction, effectiveness and tolerability.

Topical resiquimod dosing regimens in patients with multiple actinic keratoses: a multicentre, partly placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Topical immune response modifiers are established for actinic keratosis (AK) treatment and efforts are underway to make further improvements to their efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the optimal dosing regimens of the Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist resiquimod in terms of efficacy, safety and tolerability. METHODS: In a multicentre, partly placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial, we randomized 217 patients with AK lesions to 0·03% resiquimod gel once-daily application three times per week for 4 weeks or seven times within 2 weeks or five times for 1 week (arms 1/2/3) followed by a treatment-free interval of 8 weeks and one repetition of the cycle. In two additional arms (arms 4/5), patients applied either resiquimod gel 0·01% or 0·03% three times per week up to a biological end point defined by skin erosion or for a maximum duration of 8 weeks. Clearance was assessed clinically and histologically. RESULTS: Complete clinical clearance ranged from 56% to 85% with the highest rate observed in arm 2. Resiquimod 0·03% gel was more effective than 0·01% gel. Clearance rates in arms 1/2/3 were comparable and higher than with placebo and were reached with 24, 14 and 10 gel applications, respectively. Overall, 128 patients (59%) experienced treatment-related adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Resiquimod 0·03% gel is more effective than 0·01% gel. From the perspectives of safety and tolerability, the lower concentration and shorter duration are preferable. The clinical response in arms 2/3 was reached with fewer gel applications. The dosing regimens that used the biological end point (arms 4/5) proved equally efficacious as predefined treatment durations and may therefore be suitable for personalized AK treatment.

A randomized split-scalp study comparing calcipotriol-assisted methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) with conventional MAL-PDT for the treatment of actinic keratosis.

BACKGROUND: Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an approved treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). To enhance the efficacy of PDT for AKs, physical and chemical pretreatments have been suggested. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of topical calcipotriol (CAL) before methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL)-PDT for AKs of the scalp vs. conventional MAL-PDT in a randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Twenty patients with multiple AKs on the scalp were randomized to receive conventional MAL-PDT with previous curettage on one side of the scalp and CAL-assisted MAL-PDT once a day for 15 days before illumination on the other side. After 3 months, patients were evaluated for clearance of AKs, side-effects and histopathology before and after the procedure. Protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) fluorescence was measured before and after illumination on both sides. RESULTS: All 20 patients completed the study. Overall AK clearance rates were 92·1% and 82·0% for CAL-PDT and conventional PDT, respectively (P < 0·001). Grade 1 AKs showed similar response rates for both sides (P = 0·055). However, grade II AKs showed more improvement on the CAL-PDT side (90%) than on the MAL-PDT side (63%) (P < 0·001). Before illumination, PpIX fluorescence intensity was higher on the CAL-assisted side (P = 0·048). The treatment was more painful on the CAL-PDT side, although well tolerated. The mean visual analogue scale score was 5·4 ± 1·4 on the CAL-PDT side and 4·0 ± 0·69 on the conventional MAL-PDT side (P = 0·001). Side-effects such as erythema (P = 0·019), oedema (P = 0·002) and crusts (P < 0·001) were more pronounced on the CAL-assisted side. Histopathological analyses were obtained from five patients and both sides showed improved keratinocyte atypia following PDT, with slightly more improvement on the CAL-assisted side. CONCLUSIONS: CAL-assisted PDT proved to be safe and more effective than conventional MAL-PDT for the treatment of AKs on the scalp. CAL pretreatment increased PpIX accumulation within the skin and may have enhanced the efficacy in this first human trial.

A randomized, multinational, noninferiority, phase III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BF-200 aminolaevulinic acid gel vs. methyl aminolaevulinate cream in the treatment of nonaggressive basal cell carcinoma with photodynamic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) represents the most common nonmelanoma skin cancer worldwide, affecting mainly adult, fair-skinned individuals. The World Health Organization distinguishes aggressive and nonaggressive forms, of which prototypical variants of the latter are primary nodular and superficial BCC. OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate noninferiority of BF-200 ALA (a nanoemulsion gel containing 5-aminolaevulinic acid) compared with MAL (a cream containing methyl aminolaevulinate) in the treatment of nonaggressive BCC with photodynamic therapy (PDT). Noninferiority of the primary efficacy variable (overall patient complete response 12 weeks after last PDT) would be declared if the mean response for BF-200 ALA was no worse than that for MAL, within a statistical margin of Δ = -15%. METHODS: The study was a randomized, phase III trial performed in Germany and the U.K. with ongoing 5-year follow-up. Of 281 randomized patients, 138 were treated with BF-200 ALA and 143 with MAL. Patients received two PDT sessions 1 week apart. Remaining lesions 12 weeks after the second PDT were retreated. Illumination was performed with a red light source (635 nm, 37 J cm-2 ). The results shown include clinical end points and patients' reassessment 12 months after the last PDT. The study was registered with EudraCT (number 2013-003241-42). RESULTS: Of the BF-200 ALA-treated patients, 93·4% were complete responders compared with 91·8% in the MAL group. The difference of means was 1·6, with a one-sided 97·5% confidence interval of -6·5, establishing noninferiority (P < 0·0001). The results for secondary efficacy parameters were in line with the primary outcome. Recurrence rates 12 months after the last treatment were ≤ 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of nonaggressive BCC with BF-200 ALA-PDT is highly effective and well tolerated with proven noninferiority to MAL-PDT. It demonstrates low recurrence rates after 1 year of follow-up.

Actinic keratoses show variable histological basal growth patterns - a proposed classification adjustment.

BACKGROUND: Common histological classification schemes of actinic keratoses (AK) do not evaluate growth patterns at basal epidermal aspects of AK. Until now, the importance of basal epidermal growth patterns of AK has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the extent of atypical keratinocytes throughout the epidermis and variation in basal growth patterns of AK. METHODS: AK lesions occurring on the head/face from patients seen in routine practice were assessed histologically. We determined histological grade (AK I-III), basal growth patterns of atypical keratinocytes (crowding, budding and papillary sprouting) and accompanying parameters. RESULTS: Of the 246 lesions included, 28.0% were histologically classified as AK I, 46.7% as AK II and 25.2% as AK III. Approximately 26.4% of the basal growth patterns were classified as crowding (pro I), 49.6% as budding (pro II), 17.9% as papillary sprouting (pro III) and 6.1% without basal directed growth. No significant correlation of the histological AK I-III grading and underlying growth patterns was observed (P = 0.4666). However, adnexal structure involvement (OR = 2.37; 95% CI 1.21-4.65), infiltration (OR = 2.53; 95% CI 1.31-4.90) and increased number of vessels (OR = 2.56; 95% CI 1.42-4.65) were independent positive predictive markers for pro II and pro III basal growth patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Basal growth patterns (pro I-III) in AK do not correlate with the established AK I-III histological grading system. Besides the degree of upward extension, varying degrees of downward extension exist. Histological classification should consider both, upwards and downward growth patterns when assessing AK.

Patient-reported health outcomes in patients with non-melanoma skin cancer and actinic keratosis: results from a large-scale observational study analysing effects of diagnoses and disease progression.

BACKGROUND: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and actinic keratosis (AK) are very common among fair-skinned individuals. A disease continuum from AK to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has been frequently postulated. AK and NMSC may influence quality of life (QL) of patients, and it can be suspected that disease progression entails a QL reduction. The purpose of this study was to document QL in patients with NMSC and AK using the health-outcome questionnaire EQ-5D-5L. METHODS: The study was designed as a non-interventional, prospective, cross-sectional study. Patients with AK, SCC, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or multiple diagnoses were enrolled in this study in 29 dermatological centres across Germany. Patients were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L (compromising EQ Index and EQ VAS), and the dermatologists provided diagnosis, disease history and treatment data. RESULTS: A total of 1184 patients were enrolled and diagnosed as follows: 73% AK, 49% BCC and 17% SCC. 66% had a single diagnosis, 28% two different diagnoses and 6% three different diagnoses. QL was strongly associated with patients' diagnosis. Patients with a single AK diagnosis had significantly higher mean EQ VAS (78) than patients with BCC (74), SCC (72), and BCC plus SCC (69), P < 0.050. When the effects of disease progression were calculated, patients with AK plus SCC reported significantly less mean EQ VAS (71) than patients with a single AK diagnosis (78), P < 0.011. CONCLUSIONS: While rarely being imminently life-threatening, NMSC and AK have an impact on QL as quantified by the EQ-5D-5L. This impact is associated with diagnosis (AK vs. NMSC) and clinical progression (AK vs. AK plus SCC). Both lead to a clear decline in QL. This shows that disease progression is perceived and judged as detrimental by patients and that AK and NMSC should be diligently treated to preserve and restore QL.